In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, which complication was most frequently encountered?
A. Implant breakage
B. Deep infection
C. Edema formation
D. Minor screw tract discharge
E. Skin necrosis
Answer: Minor screw tract discharge
Explanation: Screw tract discharge was the most common minor complication, particularly at proximal screws.
In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, which imaging modality was used to assess bone volume and callus HU?
A. Standard radiography
B. Computed tomography
C. Ultrasonography
D. MRI
E. Bone scintigraphy
Answer: Computed tomography
Explanation: CT allowed objective, quantitative assessment of callus area and Hounsfield Units (HU).
In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, what was the median fracture healing time observed in cats and dogs?
A. 27 days
B. 38.5 days
C. 50.5 days
D. 65.0 days
E. 88 days
Answer: 50.5 days
Explanation: The median healing time was reported as 50.5 days (range: 27–88).
In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, which screw configuration was consistently used for adequate stability?
A. One monocortical screw per fragment
B. Three monocortical screws per fragment
C. Two bicortical screws per fragment
D. Four bicortical screws per segment
E. Variable-length monocortical screws
Answer: Two bicortical screws per fragment
Explanation: The study emphasized at least two bicortical screws per fragment for adequate stabilization.
In İnal 2025 et al., on supracutaneous locking plates, what was one key advantage of SLPs over external skeletal fixation in bilateral fractures?
A. Stronger fixation
B. Titanium material compatibility
C. Reduced bulk, no entanglement
D. Higher compressive strength
E. Lower surgery cost
Answer: Reduced bulk, no entanglement
Explanation: The SLP design prevented interference in bilateral applications, unlike bulky external fixators.