In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, what did the authors conclude regarding high-strain construct scenarios?
A. Use 3-point bending to reduce load
B. Select plates with longer working lengths
C. Add more locking screws proximally
D. Consider alternate strain-reduction strategies
E. Always add LHI to central holes
Answer: Consider alternate strain-reduction strategies
Explanation: LHI did not reduce strain in this model; authors recommend considering other methods for high load conditions.
In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, where was peak strain localized during testing?
A. At screw hole #1
B. At the end screw holes
C. Over the fracture defect
D. Under the central insert
E. At the mid-plate junction
Answer: Over the fracture defect
Explanation: Strain was consistently highest over the Combi-hole spanning the simulated fracture gap.
In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, what was the impact of LHI on plate strain in a fracture-gap model?
A. Significant reduction in strain
B. Strain reduced only at gauge 3
C. No measurable effect
D. Strain doubled with 9 LHI
E. Strain reduced only with torque > 6 Nm
Answer: No measurable effect
Explanation: No statistically significant change in strain was observed with any LHI configuration.
In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, why might LHI fail to reduce strain in LCP Combi-holes?
A. They engage 360° with the threads
B. They cause stress risers at locking side
C. They fill only the compression component
D. They do not engage the compression side
E. They seal the plate’s curvature
Answer: They do not engage the compression side
Explanation: Because LHI only fill the locking portion of the Combi-hole, strain at the compression side remains unaffected.
In Hawker 2025 et al., on locking head inserts, what effect did LHI have on axial stiffness and displacement?
A. Increased both
B. Increased stiffness only
C. Reduced stiffness slightly
D. No significant effect
E. Reduced displacement only
Answer: No significant effect
Explanation: No statistical differences in axial stiffness or deformation were noted between groups.