In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what percentage of dehisced incisions demonstrated both skin and subcutis involvement?
A. 5%
B. 10%
C. 14%
D. 25%
E. 40%
Answer: 14%
Explanation: 3 out of 21 dogs with available data had both skin and subcutis dehiscence, approximately 14.3%.
In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the study’s conclusion regarding PDS versus Monocryl use?
A. PDS had a significantly lower dehiscence rate than Monocryl
B. Monocryl caused more inflammation
C. PDS and Monocryl had equivalent outcomes
D. Monocryl resulted in higher infection rates
E. PDS was more cost-effective
Answer: PDS and Monocryl had equivalent outcomes
Explanation: The study found no statistically significant difference in dehiscence rates between groups using PDS or Monocryl for skin closure.
In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, what was the overall rate of incisional dehiscence without infection?
A. 2.6%
B. 5.9%
C. 9.5%
D. 12.2%
E. 14.3%
Answer: 9.5%
Explanation: 22 out of 232 dogs experienced non-infected incisional dehiscence, equating to a 9.48% rate.
In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, which variable was also significantly associated with incisional dehiscence?
A. Anesthesia duration
B. Incision length
C. Signs of inflammation
D. Closure pattern
E. Skin barrier use
Answer: Signs of inflammation
Explanation: Signs of inflammation at the incision site were strongly associated with dehiscence (p < .001).
In Caiazzo 2025 et al., on suture material comparison, which factor was significantly associated with incisional dehiscence?
A. Suture pattern
B. Closure direction
C. Postoperative antibiotic use
D. Surgeon's experience
E. Preoperative skin concerns
Answer: Postoperative antibiotic use
Explanation: Lack of postoperative antibiotics was significantly associated with higher dehiscence rates (p = .023).
