In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, what surgical construct was used for the medial TPF in Case 3?
A. Two 2.0 mm lag screws with washers
B. Two 0.9 mm K-wires with tension band wire
C. Lateral buttress plate with locking screws
D. Two cortical screws with TPLO plate only
E. Two lag screws with an external fixator
Answer: Two 0.9 mm K-wires with tension band wire
Explanation: Medial TPF in Case 3 was repaired using two 0.9 mm K-wires and a figure-of-eight tension band wire.
In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, what minor complication was observed postoperatively in Case 2?
A. Complete implant failure with luxation
B. Soft tissue infection around implants
C. Screw and K-wire yield with step defect
D. Plate migration into stifle joint
E. Meniscal incarceration after fixation
Answer: Screw and K-wire yield with step defect
Explanation: Case 2 experienced implant yield at 2 weeks, leading to a 0.8 mm step defect on CT.
In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, what factor contributed to the implant yield in Case 2?
A. Over-torqued screws during insertion
B. Unrecognized infection post-op
C. Failure to use bone grafts
D. Concurrent fibular fracture reducing construct stability
E. Early weightbearing with aggressive rehab
Answer: Concurrent fibular fracture reducing construct stability
Explanation: The authors note that reduced stability due to the concurrent fibular fracture likely contributed to implant yield.
In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, which approach was used for lateral TPFs?
A. Medial parapatellar arthrotomy
B. Lateral retinacular arthrotomy
C. Cranial approach through extensor tendon
D. Lateral approach with lateral meniscus elevation
E. Caudomedial retroarticular exposure
Answer: Lateral approach with lateral meniscus elevation
Explanation: The lateral approach included caudolateral arthrotomy with elevation of the lateral meniscus for visualization.
In Adams 2024 et al., on canine tibial plateau fractures, what was the long-term functional outcome for the two cases that completed LOAD questionnaires?
A. Severe dysfunction, LOAD >25
B. Moderate dysfunction, LOAD 12–15
C. Mild dysfunction, LOAD 6–10
D. Excellent function, LOAD 5
E. Normal scores not reported
Answer: Excellent function, LOAD 5
Explanation: Both cases that completed LOAD surveys had excellent scores of 5/52, indicating minimal long-term dysfunction.