In Dalton 2023 et al., on acetabular fracture repair, how were bone plates adapted preoperatively?
A. Manually contoured intraoperatively
B. Shaped using traditional radiographs
C. Contoured to mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves
D. Contoured to a generic canine pelvic model
E. Shaped post-reduction using bone forceps
Answer: Contoured to mirrored 3D-printed hemipelves
Explanation: The technique used mirrored 3D-printed models of the contralateral hemipelvis for patient-specific plate contouring.
In Dalton 2023 et al., on acetabular fracture repair, what was the functional outcome for the clinical case treated with this technique?
A. Non-weight bearing at 1 month
B. Weight bearing delayed until 4 weeks
C. Non-union at 3 months
D. Weight bearing within 24 hours and healed at 3 months
E. Plate removed at 2 weeks
Answer: Weight bearing within 24 hours and healed at 3 months
Explanation: The Chihuahua case showed rapid functional recovery and confirmed radiographic healing by 3 months.
In Dalton 2023 et al., on acetabular fracture repair, what was the most likely advantage of using locking screws during the procedure?
A. Increased interfragmentary compression
B. Faster surgical time
C. Increased bone density
D. Preservation of soft tissue
E. Facilitated reduction due to fixed angle mechanics
Answer: Facilitated reduction due to fixed angle mechanics
Explanation: Locking screws provided fixed-angle stability that helped maintain reduction despite longer working length and lack of compression.
In Dalton 2023 et al., on acetabular fracture repair, what was the median postoperative fracture gap reported in canine cadavers?
A. >3 mm
B. 2–3 mm
C. <2 mm
D. 1.5–2.5 mm
E. >5 mm
Answer: <2 mm
Explanation: The median postoperative fracture gap was consistently less than 2 mm in all cadaver specimens, demonstrating precise fracture reduction.
In Dalton 2023 et al., on acetabular fracture repair, what was a reported potential benefit of the minimally invasive approach compared to traditional open techniques?
A. Ability to avoid fluoroscopy
B. Direct visual assessment of sciatic nerve
C. Higher rate of compression
D. Reduced retraction-related nerve injury
E. Shorter plate working length
Answer: Reduced retraction-related nerve injury
Explanation: Reduced risk to the sciatic nerve was noted, likely due to avoidance of direct retraction and protection by preserved soft tissues.