In Niida 2024 et al., on surgical residents and TPLO time, what was reported about osteotomy healing or union outcomes?
A. Union was faster in resident cases
B. Healing rates were lower with residents
C. Union was consistent across groups
D. Union was not assessed
E. Healing was significantly delayed
Answer: Union was not assessed
Explanation: Healing outcomes were not part of the study; cases needing reoperation were excluded.
In Niida 2024 et al., on surgical residents and TPLO time, how much longer did residents take compared to faculty surgeons (FS)?
A. 10% longer
B. 25% longer
C. 39% longer
D. 54% longer
E. 70% longer
Answer: 54% longer
Explanation: Resident surgeries took 1.54x the time of FS cases (153 vs 99 min).
In Niida 2024 et al., on surgical residents and TPLO time, what trend was seen across the 3 years of residency training?
A. Linear improvement in time each year
B. Time increased with experience
C. Significant improvement only after YR-2
D. Improvement plateaued after YR-1
E. No change in any year
Answer: Improvement plateaued after YR-1
Explanation: TPLO duration dropped after YR-1 but remained stable between YR-2 and YR-3.
In Niida 2024 et al., on surgical residents and TPLO time, what data did the study provide on complication rates?
A. Residents had more infections
B. Complication rates favored faculty surgeons
C. Complication rates were the same for both
D. Complication rates were not evaluated
E. The study showed delayed healing in resident cases
Answer: Complication rates were not evaluated
Explanation: The study specifically excluded outcomes data and focused on surgical time only.
In Niida 2024 et al., on surgical residents and TPLO time, which surgical phase improved most as residents progressed in training?
A. Arthrotomy
B. Meniscal treatment
C. Tibial osteotomy
D. Skin closure
E. Post-op imaging
Answer: Tibial osteotomy
Explanation: Decreased tibial osteotomy duration accounted for most surgical time improvement across years.