← Articles

Gibson et al: Evaluation of mediastinoscopy for cranial mediastinal and tracheobronchial lymphadenectomy in canine cadavers
Veterinary Surgery 5, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mediastinoscopy was technically feasible in large-breed canine cadavers using a SILS port and standard laparoscopic instruments.
  • The left tracheobronchial lymph node (LTBLN) was successfully retrieved in all cadavers (7/7), while cranial mediastinal lymph nodes were retrieved in only 1/7.
  • Postprocedural pleural gas was observed in 4/7 cadavers, likely due to CO₂ insufflation.
  • Instrument limitations with a human-designed mediastinoscope led to preference for laparoscopic instruments and SILS port for improved access and visualization.
  • Complication rates were low, with only two minor (Grade 1) adverse events (pleural tear and LN rupture).
  • Obesity and mediastinal fat were cited as potential challenges to visualization and node retrieval.
  • NASA-TLX workload scores were lowest for tracheobronchial nodes, indicating these were the easiest to access.
  • The authors concluded this approach may facilitate minimally invasive biopsy or resection of cranial mediastinal masses in live dogs, but clinical trials are needed to validate safety and efficacy.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
‍We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍Mind trying that again?
← Articles

Gibson et al: Evaluation of mediastinoscopy for cranial mediastinal and tracheobronchial lymphadenectomy in canine cadavers
Veterinary Surgery 5, 2024

🔍 Key Findings

  • Mediastinoscopy was technically feasible in large-breed canine cadavers using a SILS port and standard laparoscopic instruments.
  • The left tracheobronchial lymph node (LTBLN) was successfully retrieved in all cadavers (7/7), while cranial mediastinal lymph nodes were retrieved in only 1/7.
  • Postprocedural pleural gas was observed in 4/7 cadavers, likely due to CO₂ insufflation.
  • Instrument limitations with a human-designed mediastinoscope led to preference for laparoscopic instruments and SILS port for improved access and visualization.
  • Complication rates were low, with only two minor (Grade 1) adverse events (pleural tear and LN rupture).
  • Obesity and mediastinal fat were cited as potential challenges to visualization and node retrieval.
  • NASA-TLX workload scores were lowest for tracheobronchial nodes, indicating these were the easiest to access.
  • The authors concluded this approach may facilitate minimally invasive biopsy or resection of cranial mediastinal masses in live dogs, but clinical trials are needed to validate safety and efficacy.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Join Now to Access Key Summaries to more Veterinary Surgery Articles!
Log InSign Up

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Gibson 2024 et al., on mediastinoscopy in dogs, what lymph node was **most consistently retrieved** using the SILS-port technique?

A. Right sternal
B. Left sternal
C. Left tracheobronchial
D. Cranial mediastinal
E. Right tracheobronchial

Answer: Left tracheobronchial

Explanation: The left tracheobronchial lymph node was retrieved in all 7 cadavers.
In Gibson 2024 et al., on mediastinoscopy in dogs, what was the **overall complication rate** observed during the cadaveric procedures?

A. 0%
B. 5%
C. 15%
D. 29%
E. Low with only two minor adverse events

Answer: Low with only two minor adverse events

Explanation: Only minor grade 1 events (pleural tear and LN rupture) were reported, with no major complications.
In Gibson 2024 et al., on mediastinoscopy in dogs, what was the most common **postprocedural finding on CT** after the procedure?

A. Pleural effusion
B. Pneumothorax
C. Subcutaneous emphysema
D. Pericardial effusion
E. Pleural gas accumulation

Answer: Pleural gas accumulation

Explanation: Pleural gas was seen in 4 of 7 cadavers, likely from CO₂ insufflation.
In Gibson 2024 et al., on mediastinoscopy in dogs, which factor was identified as a major **technical limitation** of using a human-designed mediastinoscope?

A. Inadequate lighting
B. Overheating of the scope
C. Working channel too short and narrow
D. Instrument reach and stability limitations
E. Too few instrument ports

Answer: Instrument reach and stability limitations

Explanation: Human-designed mediastinoscopes had channels too short and lacked adequate reach in dogs.
In Gibson 2024 et al., on mediastinoscopy in dogs, which factor most likely contributed to **difficulty in lymph node identification**?

A. Tracheal deviation
B. Contrast media reaction
C. Absence of thymus
D. Excessive thoracic movement
E. Obesity and mediastinal fat

Answer: Obesity and mediastinal fat

Explanation: Increased mediastinal fat reduced visibility and working space during dissection.

Elevate Your Infection Control Protocol

Implement Simini Protect Lavage for superior, clinically-proven post-operative skin antisepsis and reduced infection risk.

Start Your Free Trial TodayStart Your Free Trial

Review More Key Summaries from this Veterinary Surgery Journal Issue

Gibson

 et al: 

Evaluation of mediastinoscopy for cranial mediastinal and tracheobronchial lymphadenectomy in canine cadavers

Geier

 et al: 

The effect of a smoke‐evacuation unit on ultrafine particle concentrations in the operating room during approach to the proximal tibia for tibial plateau-leveling osteotomy surgery in dogs

Fracka

 et al: 

3D-printed, patient-specific cutting guides improve femoral and tibial cut alignment in canine total knee replacement

Mazdarani

 et al: 

Proximal femoral fixation method and axial load affect simulated muscle forces in an ex vivo feline limb press

Poggi

 et al: 

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 cats (2018–2024)