Glenn et al: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2024

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?