Buote et al: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2023

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed cannulas (3DPCs) reduced mean surgical time significantly in cadaveric procedures (125.6 vs 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout events decreased from a mean of 10 to 2.2 per procedure when using only 3DPCs (p = 0.03).
  • Instrument collisions were significantly fewer with 3DPCs (6.8 vs 2.6 collisions, p = 0.03).
  • Live patients experienced no postoperative complications, including no incision site infections or discomfort.
  • Initial versions of 3DPCs had minor issues, including valve leakage and looser trocar fit, requiring surgical workarounds.
  • Customization of cannula shaft length (3 cm vs standard 5–8.3 cm) improved working space and reduced instrument interference.
  • Production cost was under $5 per cannula, suggesting 3DPCs may be a cost-effective and reusable alternative for small patients.
  • Study supports broader use of 3DPCs in laparoscopic procedures requiring long-jawed instruments or intricate tissue handling.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Buote et al: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2023

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed cannulas (3DPCs) reduced mean surgical time significantly in cadaveric procedures (125.6 vs 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout events decreased from a mean of 10 to 2.2 per procedure when using only 3DPCs (p = 0.03).
  • Instrument collisions were significantly fewer with 3DPCs (6.8 vs 2.6 collisions, p = 0.03).
  • Live patients experienced no postoperative complications, including no incision site infections or discomfort.
  • Initial versions of 3DPCs had minor issues, including valve leakage and looser trocar fit, requiring surgical workarounds.
  • Customization of cannula shaft length (3 cm vs standard 5–8.3 cm) improved working space and reduced instrument interference.
  • Production cost was under $5 per cannula, suggesting 3DPCs may be a cost-effective and reusable alternative for small patients.
  • Study supports broader use of 3DPCs in laparoscopic procedures requiring long-jawed instruments or intricate tissue handling.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D-printed cannulas in feline laparoscopy, which of the following is true about instrument collisions using 3DPCs in cadaver procedures?

A. They were unchanged
B. They increased slightly
C. They occurred only with 11 mm ports
D. They decreased significantly
E. They were only noted in live cases

Answer: They decreased significantly

Explanation: Instrument collisions dropped from 6.8 to 2.6 per procedure when using 3DPCs.
In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D-printed cannulas in feline laparoscopy, what was the effect on mean surgical time?

A. No effect
B. Decreased by 15 minutes
C. Decreased by 30 minutes
D. Increased by 15 minutes
E. Increased by 30 minutes

Answer: Decreased by 30 minutes

Explanation: Use of 3DPCs reduced mean surgical time from 125.6 to 95.2 minutes (*p* = 0.03).

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.