In Sherman 2023 et al., on minimally invasive ESF, what percentage of fractures achieved radiographic union?
A. 82%
B. 90%
C. 100%
D. 96%
E. 75%
Answer: 100%
Explanation: All fractures (55/55) achieved radiographic union.
In Sherman 2023 et al., on minimally invasive ESF, what was the most common minor complication?
A. Implant migration
B. Delayed union
C. Refracture
D. Pin-tract morbidity
E. Non-weight-bearing lameness
Answer: Pin-tract morbidity
Explanation: 82% of complications were minor; pin-tract morbidity was most common.
In Sherman 2023 et al., on minimally invasive ESF, which group had a significantly higher rate of major complications?
A. Dogs with comminuted fractures
B. Cats with closed fractures
C. Dogs over 20kg
D. Open fractures
E. All fractures using type II frames
Answer: Open fractures
Explanation: Open fractures had more major complications than closed (P = .019).
In Sherman 2023 et al., on minimally invasive ESF, how did intraoperative imaging affect surgery time?
A. Increased by 40 minutes
B. No effect
C. Decreased from 100 to 74 minutes
D. Increased fluoroscopy exposure only
E. Reduced pin count required
Answer: Decreased from 100 to 74 minutes
Explanation: Intraoperative imaging shortened surgical time significantly (P = .046).
In Sherman 2023 et al., on minimally invasive ESF, what was the effect of intraoperative imaging on alignment?
A. Improved alignment significantly
B. Improved only valgus angle
C. No effect on alignment
D. Improved all sagittal angles
E. Reduced valgus but not TPA
Answer: No effect on alignment
Explanation: Intraoperative imaging did not improve fracture alignment (P > .05 for all comparisons).