Your Custom Quiz

In Vodnarek 2024 et al., on nasopharyngeal fluoroscopy, what was the **main limitation** of grading using ΔL thresholds?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Using cutoffs to categorize continuous data increases variability and may misclassify similar clinical states.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It introduces arbitrary cutoffs.
Using cutoffs to categorize continuous data increases variability and may misclassify similar clinical states.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study population: 36 brachycephalic dogs (20 French bulldogs, 16 pugs).
  • Objective: Compare intra- and interobserver reliability for fluoroscopic measurement of nasopharyngeal collapse using two methods:
    • Functional method
    • Anatomically adjusted method
  • Key measurements: Minimum (LMin), maximum (LMax) dorsoventral height, and dynamic change ratio (ΔL).
  • Outcomes:
    • Intraobserver agreement for ΔL was higher with the functional method (ICC 0.751 vs. 0.576).
    • Observer 1 (radiologist) showed excellent repeatability (>0.9 ICC).
    • Agreement for grading collapse was only moderate (κ ~0.49–0.53), worse than ΔL-based agreement.
    • ΔL ≥ 0.5 to <1 = partial collapse; ΔL = 1 = complete collapse.

Vodnarek

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Reliability of fluoroscopic examination of nasopharyngeal dorsoventral dimension change in pugs and French bulldogs

2024-1-VS-vodnarek-4

Article Title: Reliability of fluoroscopic examination of nasopharyngeal dorsoventral dimension change in pugs and French bulldogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Haine 2022 et al., on outcomes in canine limb tumors, which lateral surgical margin width significantly reduced R1 margin rates?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6–10 mm.
Only 7% had R1 margins with 6–10 mm margins versus 55% for 0–5 mm.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fewer R1 margins (tumor on ink) were achieved in mast cell tumors (MCTs) when using 6–10 mm lateral margins versus 0–5 mm (7% vs. 55%; _P_ = .049).
  • For soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), no benefit was seen in margin completeness between 0–5 mm vs. 6–10 mm lateral margins (41% vs. 43% R1).
  • Overall R1 rates were 26% for MCTs and 42% for STSs following PNE.
  • R scheme (“tumor on ink” = R1) had better interobserver agreement (83%) compared to ≤1 mm margin criteria (68% agreement).
  • Complication rate was moderate (26%), but no surgeries required revision.
  • Local recurrence/metastasis occurred in 14% of dogs, with 60% of those having R1 margins.
  • Adjunctive therapy was considered clinically indicated in 46% of 0–5 mm margin cases vs. 24% of 6–10 mm cases.
  • Histologic grade and tumor size were not predictive of margin completeness.

Haine

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

2022-7-VS-haine-2

Article Title: Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, which group demonstrated **tibial shortening** as an outcome?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group B (TPLO + CCWO) was the only group associated with tibial shortening (−0.58% change in length).
Incorrect. The correct answer is TPLO + CCWO.
Group B (TPLO + CCWO) was the only group associated with tibial shortening (−0.58% change in length).

🔍 Key Findings

  • Population: 16 dogs (27 tibias), TPA >34°
  • Techniques analyzed:
    • Group A: CBLO + CCWO
    • Group B: TPLO + CCWO
    • Group C: mCCWO
    • Group D: PTNWO
  • Outcomes:
    • All groups achieved post-correction TPA < 14°.
    • Group A: Slight over-correction (mean TPA 10.47°); greatest mechanical axis shift.
    • Group B: Tibial shortening (~0.58%); least mechanical axis shift.
    • Group C: Lowest post-correction TPA (mean 4.76°); under-correction.
    • Group D: High accuracy, minimal shortening (mean 7.09° post).
  • Statistical Significance:
    • Significant differences in tibial length change and mCrDTA (mechanical axis shift) between groups (p <.05).
    • TPA correction accuracy: Group A (1.02), B (0.95), C (0.89), D (0.98).

Story

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

2024-1-VS-story-2

Article Title: Morphologic impact of four surgical techniques to correct excessive tibial plateau angle in dogs: A theoretical radiographic analysis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on leak testing in cooled feline intestine, what was a key implication of the intraluminal diameter findings?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Ileum was widest and data may assist in future stapler selection.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Ileum had the largest diameter, helpful for device planning.
Ileum was widest and data may assist in future stapler selection.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) or maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) between cooled (17–29 h) and fresh enterotomy constructs.
  • Wall thickness of duodenum and jejunum did not differ between fresh and cooled samples.
  • Leak locations (suture holes vs clamp sites) were similar between groups; not statistically different.
  • Volume of infusion did not influence ILP or MIP outcomes.
  • Mean ILP values: Control = 600 mmHg (maxed), Fresh = 200 mmHg, Cooled = 131 mmHg; CE vs FE difference was not significant.
  • Intraluminal diameter was largest in the ileum, followed by jejunum and duodenum.
  • Cadaveric intestine cooled ≤29h may be reliably used in ex vivo feline leak pressure studies.
  • First report of gross small intestinal lengths by region in cats—useful for resection planning.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

2024-5-VS-miller-3

Article Title: Cooled feline intestine and fresh intestine did not differ in enterotomy leak pressure testing or in gross wall thickness measurement

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, what biomechanical benefit did the TBW group demonstrate over the others?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only the TBW group had zero crest fractures, unlike the 2-pin and spacer pin groups.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Distal crest fracture prevention.
Only the TBW group had zero crest fractures, unlike the 2-pin and spacer pin groups.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
  • All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
  • Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
  • Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
  • No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
  • Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
  • Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
  • Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.

Sullivan

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-3

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Espinel Rupérez 2023 et al., on feline hip stabilization, what factor most likely contributed to the absence of complications in the final 4 joints?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The authors noted a learning curve effect, with no complications or deviations in the last 4 joints.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Experience gained during procedure.
The authors noted a learning curve effect, with no complications or deviations in the last 4 joints.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization (AA-HTS) was successfully completed in all 14 feline cadaver joints.
  • Femoral and acetabular tunnel creation was feasible in all cases, though femoral tunnel placement had a higher rate of deviations.
  • Intraoperative complications occurred in 5/14 joints, mostly related to femoral tunnel creation and toggle lodging.
  • Minor articular cartilage injury (<10% total cartilage area) occurred in 10/14 joints, but no injury to neurovascular or intrapelvic structures.
  • Thirteen surgical technique deviations (8 major, 5 minor) were identified in 7 joints, all involving the femoral tunnel.
  • Toggle passage through the femoral tunnel was the most challenging step, being mildly difficult in 6 joints.
  • Postoperative CT and gross dissection confirmed all toggles and buttons were in correct position, without damage to major surrounding structures.
  • No deviations, complications, or cartilage injuries occurred in the last 4 joints, suggesting a learning curve effect.

Espinel Rupérez

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

2023-6-VS-espinel-5

Article Title: Arthroscopic-assisted hip toggle stabilization in cats: An ex vivo feasibility study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Deveci 2025 et al., on 3D drill guides, what was the median screw trajectory deviation in the transverse plane?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The median angular deviation from plan was 0.88° transverse and 0.72° dorsal.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.88 degrees.
The median angular deviation from plan was 0.88° transverse and 0.72° dorsal.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Objective: Evaluate feasibility and accuracy of 3D-printed patient-specific drill guides for iliosacral screw placement in cadaver dogs.
  • N = 10 canine cadavers (20 hemipelves); screw placement done using fluoroscopic-assisted patient-specific guides (PSG).
  • Median cortical breach grade: 0 (IQR 0–1) for all screws.
    19/20 screws breached sacral canal wall (all ≤ grade 2), but no screws breached canal contents (grade 3).
  • Median trajectory deviation: 0.88° transverse, 0.72° dorsal.
  • Procedure time: Median 7.2 minutes for guide placement and drilling.
  • Conclusions: PSG-assisted screw placement was safe, accurate, and fast, offering clinical potential in pelvic trauma.

Deveci

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Evaluation of 3D‐printed patient‐specific guides to facilitate fluoroscopic‐assisted iliosacral screw placement in dogs

2025-2-VS-deveci-3

Article Title: Evaluation of 3D‐printed patient‐specific guides to facilitate fluoroscopic‐assisted iliosacral screw placement in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In McCarthy 2022 et al., on 3D drill guide accuracy, how did CT and 3D analysis compare in assessing drill angles?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A correlation coefficient of r = 0.77 indicated good agreement.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Strong correlation existed between CT and 3D analysis.
A correlation coefficient of r = 0.77 indicated good agreement.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed drill guides (3D-GDT) significantly reduced craniocaudal and dorsoventral drilling angle deviation compared to free-hand drilling technique (FHDT), with statistical significance (p < .0001 and p = .01 respectively).
  • No sacral corridor breaches occurred with 3D-GDT, whereas FHDT resulted in 20% drill exit incidences (3/15 cases).
  • 3D-GDT had lower deviation from optimal drill trajectory at end points in all axes: craniocaudal (1.84 ± 1.6 mm vs. 4.18 ± 2.4 mm), dorsoventral (1.11 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.4 ± 1.5 mm), and 3D linear (2.47 ± 1.4 mm vs. 5.35 ± 2.2 mm), all statistically significant.
  • Strong correlation (r = 0.77) between CT and 3D software measurements validated method reliability.
  • 3D guide trajectories showed consistent proximity to the optimal trajectory, especially at drill endpoints, indicating reduced variability in execution.
  • 3D-GDT was developed using open-source software and inexpensive materials, supporting future clinical application.
  • Major errors in FHDT occurred primarily at the drill endpoint, underscoring the challenge of maintaining optimal angulation during free-hand drilling.
  • The sacral corridor was recharacterized as pyramidal (not quadrilateral), with implications for safer implant placement.

McCarthy

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

2022-1-VS-mccarthy-4

Article Title: Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Perez Neto 2025 et al., on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, approximately how many times body weight did prosthetic femurs withstand before failure?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Despite reduced load tolerance vs. controls, prosthetic femurs still exceeded ~6× body weight capacity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6.2×.
Despite reduced load tolerance vs. controls, prosthetic femurs still exceeded ~6× body weight capacity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • In an ex vivo study of 20 canine femur pairs, implantation of a novel hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) prosthesis reduced maximum load (ML) by 22% and load at collapse (LC) by 27% vs. intact controls (p ≤ 0.05).
  • Displacement at maximum load (DML), displacement at collapse (DC), and stiffness (k) were not significantly different between prosthesis and control groups.
  • Both groups showed similar failure patterns, with 92% failing at the femoral neck.
  • All prosthetic femurs still withstood ~6.2× body weight — exceeding estimated in vivo peak loads (~1.64× BW).
  • Prosthesis positioning (neutral vs valgus) had no significant effect on biomechanical outcomes.
  • Implant design preserved more metaphyseal bone stock than total hip replacement, possibly explaining the smaller load reduction compared to other short-stem prostheses.
  • The press-fit cobalt–chromium design with conical stem allowed full contact and stress distribution over the femoral head/neck.
  • Authors conclude the device has adequate immediate biomechanical strength for clinical use, though long-term in vivo studies are needed.

Perez Neto

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

4

2025

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

2025-4-VCOT-perezneto-4

Article Title: Biomechanical Evaluation of a Femoral Implant for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Evers 2022 et al., on bone-to-tendon plate fixation, what was the primary reason for anchoring the plate to the tendon instead of the bone?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Small proximal calcaneal fragments limited conventional screw fixation, necessitating tendon anchoring.
Incorrect. The correct answer is The proximal bone fragments were too small for screw purchase.
Small proximal calcaneal fragments limited conventional screw fixation, necessitating tendon anchoring.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Bone-to-tendon plate fixation allowed successful stabilization of a highly comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog with fragments too small for traditional fixation.
  • The plate was sutured to the common calcaneal tendon using a figure-of-8 pattern, bypassing the need for screw fixation into small proximal fragments.
  • Radiographic union was achieved by 17 weeks, though considered delayed, with the dog returning to normal function by 36 weeks post-op.
  • A second surgery was required to replace the tendon-anchored plate with a calcaneus-only plate due to skin ulceration and implant prominence.
  • Implant-associated infection was suspected; cultures confirmed Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, managed with doxycycline and clindamycin.
  • Use of human placental matrix (hPM) and both autogenous and allogenic bone grafts supported healing, though their specific contribution remains uncertain.
  • Postoperative complications included delayed union and skin ulceration, emphasizing challenges of implant design and soft tissue management.
  • This is the first report of using a bone-to-tendon plate for a calcaneus fracture in dogs and demonstrates its potential in cases where traditional methods are not viable.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Use of a bone‐to‐tendon plate to stabilize a comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog

2022-5-VS-evers-1

Article Title: Use of a bone‐to‐tendon plate to stabilize a comminuted calcaneus fracture in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.