Your Custom Quiz

In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, which surgical maneuver was used to correct antebrachiocarpal incongruency?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The radioulnar ligament was transected to allow mobility of the distal radial segment for angular correction and carpal congruity.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Radioulnar ligament transection.
The radioulnar ligament was transected to allow mobility of the distal radial segment for angular correction and carpal congruity.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CESF with distraction osteogenesis restored elbow congruity and normalized aLDRA in skeletally immature dogs with PCDRP.
  • Radial head subluxation was eliminated in all dogs, and elbow incongruity reduced significantly (from 6.1 mm to 0.3 mm, p <.01).
  • Mean radial lengthening of 22.6 mm (∼11% of normal length) was achieved, but only 80% of recorded distraction translated to length gain.
  • Major complications occurred in 2/12 dogs: one with permanent carpal contracture, one with radial fracture at wire tract.
  • Minor complications (e.g., carpal pain, restricted extension, synostosis, pin tract issues) were noted in 10/12 dogs but generally resolved.
  • Owner surveys (8/12 dogs) reported good to excellent long-term function, even up to 6 years post-op.
  • Radial valgus deformities were moderate (mean 15°) and less severe than deformities from ulnar physeal closure.
  • Surgical strategy included staged distraction, with radial or combined radius/ulna distraction guided by fluoroscopy and adjusted per case.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

2025-6-VS-demoya-5

Article Title: Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Chen 2024 et al., on pressure-measurement tools, how much does the risk of poor outcome increase per 1 mm Hg rise in portal pressure during complete PSS occlusion?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. A 1 mm Hg rise increases odds of failure by 9%, highlighting the need for precise monitoring.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 9%.
A 1 mm Hg rise increases odds of failure by 9%, highlighting the need for precise monitoring.

🔍 Key Findings

  • WMg (water manometer with gauge) was the most accurate and precise pressure measurement device.
  • APT (arterial pressure transducer) was less accurate than WMg but still precise; it differed significantly from the gold standard (WMr).
  • CCT (Compass CT) was the least accurate and precise and differed significantly from the set pressure.
  • Mean differences from set pressure were smallest for WMg (−0.020 cm H2O), moderate for APT (−0.390 cm H2O), and largest for CCT (−1.267 cm H2O).
  • All devices showed excellent interobserver (ICC = 1.000) and intraobserver agreement (ICC range 0.985–0.998).
  • Even though the CCT performed least well, all devices had mean errors ≤1.3 cm H2O, indicating potential clinical utility.
  • WMg or WMr should be preferred in surgical settings due to superior accuracy and precision.
  • Measurement precision is more critical than accuracy during PSS surgery, as a 1 mm Hg (~1.3 cm H2O) increase in portal pressure raises odds of poor outcomes by 9%.

Chen

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Accuracy, precision, and interobserver and intraobserver agreements related to pressure-measurement devices

2024-4-VS-chen-5

Article Title: Accuracy, precision, and interobserver and intraobserver agreements related to pressure-measurement devices

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fidelis 2025 et al., on suture eyelet geometry, what was the **primary mode of failure** observed across all tests?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All failures were due to suture breakage; no anchor pull-out or anchor deformation was reported.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Suture breakage.
All failures were due to suture breakage; no anchor pull-out or anchor deformation was reported.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Raised eyelets caused more suture mid-section failures than embedded eyelets, suggesting wear or cutting against the anchor.
  • No significant effect of cyclic loading on failure load (Fmax) was found for any anchor group.
  • Anika anchor showed the least reduction in suture strength relative to the reference (eyebolt screw), indicating a favorable design.
  • All sutures failed via suture breakage, not anchor pullout, indicating suture fatigue was the primary failure mode.
  • Sutures in raised eyelets more often failed at the mid-section, while those in embedded eyelets failed at the knot.
  • IMEX and Jorvet anchors showed significantly reduced Fmax compared to eyebolt screws.
  • Loading direction and anchor design likely affect wear and ultimate failure, particularly in dynamic in vivo conditions.
  • Future designs should aim for embedded, smooth eyelets that can accommodate larger suture sizes without increasing wear.

Fidelis

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

2025-6-VS-fidelis-5

Article Title: Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Guevara 2024 et al., on implant placement accuracy, what was the odds ratio (OR) for successful placement using freehand compared to 3DPG?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Freehand technique was significantly less likely to result in acceptable placement (OR = 0.28, p < .0001).
Incorrect. The correct answer is 0.28 (p < .0001).
Freehand technique was significantly less likely to result in acceptable placement (OR = 0.28, p < .0001).

🔍 Key Findings:

  • Sample: 24 canine cadavers, 477 total pins across 240 vertebrae.
  • Technique Comparison: 3D printed guides (3DPG) vs freehand (FH).
  • Acceptable Placement Rates: 3DPG = 87.5%, FH = 69.8% (p < .0001).
  • Odds Ratio for FH: 0.28 (95% CI 0.16–0.47), significantly less likely to yield acceptable placement.
  • Worst Accuracy Locations: T10 (OR 0.10), T11 (OR 0.35).
  • Surgeon Impact: Surgeon 2 outperformed others (OR 9.61, p = .001).
  • Modified Zdichavsky Classification used to score implant accuracy (Grades I–IIIb).
  • Primary Benefit of 3DPG: Increased safety and precision, regardless of surgeon experience.

Guevara

Veterinary Surgery

2

2024

Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines

2024-2-VS-guevara-2

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of pin placement with patient-specific drill guides or freehand technique in canine cadaveric spines

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Brisimi 2022 et al., on tracheal anastomosis tension, what suture pattern and material was used for the anastomoses?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study used 2-0 polypropylene in a simple continuous pattern with 4 mm spacing.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Simple continuous with polypropylene.
The study used 2-0 polypropylene in a simple continuous pattern with 4 mm spacing.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Tracheal anastomoses in immature dogs failed at significantly lower distraction forces (44.91 ± 59.03 N) than in adults (149.31 ± 45.36 N; _P_ = .007).
  • Immature tracheae tolerated significantly more elongation before failure (39.75 ± 5.45%) than adult tracheae (30.57 ± 7.19%; _P_ = .0012).
  • All constructs failed by suture tearing through the annular ligament, primarily near the dorsal tracheal ring.
  • Overlapping of tracheal ends was seen in 50% of specimens across both age groups, suggesting limitations in tissue apposition with the chosen technique.
  • Simple continuous pattern using 2-0 polypropylene was used; this pattern provides superior tensile strength compared to simple interrupted, but apposition may be suboptimal.
  • Tracheal elasticity in immature dogs may allow longer resections, but the lower tensile strength necessitates reinforcement.
  • Annular ligament-cartilage technique with 4-mm suture spacing showed variable results; smaller bites and nylon suture may improve outcomes.
  • Ex vivo setup using frozen-thawed tracheae is a limitation, but prior studies support comparability with fresh tissue.

Brisimi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2022

Influence of age on resistance to distraction after tracheal anastomoses in dogs: An ex vivo study

2022-5-VS-brisimi-5

Article Title: Influence of age on resistance to distraction after tracheal anastomoses in dogs: An ex vivo study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In De Moya 2025 et al., on antebrachial deformity correction, what was the mean total radial lengthening achieved after distraction osteogenesis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Mean lengthening was 22.6 mm, representing ~11% increase compared to the contralateral radius.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 22.6 mm.
Mean lengthening was 22.6 mm, representing ~11% increase compared to the contralateral radius.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CESF with distraction osteogenesis restored elbow congruity and normalized aLDRA in skeletally immature dogs with PCDRP.
  • Radial head subluxation was eliminated in all dogs, and elbow incongruity reduced significantly (from 6.1 mm to 0.3 mm, p <.01).
  • Mean radial lengthening of 22.6 mm (∼11% of normal length) was achieved, but only 80% of recorded distraction translated to length gain.
  • Major complications occurred in 2/12 dogs: one with permanent carpal contracture, one with radial fracture at wire tract.
  • Minor complications (e.g., carpal pain, restricted extension, synostosis, pin tract issues) were noted in 10/12 dogs but generally resolved.
  • Owner surveys (8/12 dogs) reported good to excellent long-term function, even up to 6 years post-op.
  • Radial valgus deformities were moderate (mean 15°) and less severe than deformities from ulnar physeal closure.
  • Surgical strategy included staged distraction, with radial or combined radius/ulna distraction guided by fluoroscopy and adjusted per case.

De Moya

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

2025-6-VS-demoya-4

Article Title: Treatment of antebrachial deformities secondary to premature closure of the distal radial physis using circular external skeletal fixation and distraction osteogenesis in skeletally immature dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Saitoh 2025 et al., on CTS stabilization, which outcome was reported in all 10 surveyed dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All surveyed dogs showed lameness improvement or resolution following CTS and coaptation.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Improved or resolved lameness.
All surveyed dogs showed lameness improvement or resolution following CTS and coaptation.

🔍 Key Findings

Study population: 12 dogs with medial or lateral tarsocrural joint instability (TCI), including 5 working farm dogs.
Procedure: Temporary immobilization using a calcaneotibial screw (CTS) combined with external coaptation (EC).
Stabilization techniques:

  • 3 dogs = primary ligamentous repair
  • 8 dogs = synthetic ligament reconstruction
  • 2 dogs = malleolar fracture repair

Follow-up: Median 31 months (range 4–66); 10 owners completed outcome survey.
Outcomes:

  • All 10 dogs had improved or resolved lameness.
  • All 5 farm dogs returned to work (most at full or substantial capacity).
  • Complication rate: 4 distinct events in 3 dogs (1 major = CTS breakage; 3 minor = bandage-related soft tissue injuries).

Conclusion: CTS + EC provided effective immobilization with low complication rate, and functional outcomes were favorable even in active dogs.

Saitoh

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Retrospective evaluation of postoperative joint immobilization using a temporary calcaneotibial screw for medial or lateral tarsocrural joint instability in dogs

2025-1-VS-saitoh-1

Article Title: Retrospective evaluation of postoperative joint immobilization using a temporary calcaneotibial screw for medial or lateral tarsocrural joint instability in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Glenn 2024 et al., on questionnaire specificity, which algorithm had the highest specificity for SSI detection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Algorithm 2 had the highest specificity (97.9%) and is preferred when false positives must be minimized.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Algorithm 2.
Algorithm 2 had the highest specificity (97.9%) and is preferred when false positives must be minimized.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Glenn

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

2024-1-VS-glenn-3

Article Title: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Heald 2022 et al., on PED wound therapy, which of the following statements best describes the cat's outcome after PED treatment?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Culture on day 17 showed no infection, and the wound healed fully by day 47.
Incorrect. The correct answer is PED resolved infection and wound healed by day 47.
Culture on day 17 showed no infection, and the wound healed fully by day 47.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Electroceutical dressing (PED) promoted complete healing of chronic wounds in both a dog and a cat previously unresponsive to standard therapies.
  • Infection clearance occurred in both animals by the end of PED therapy, as shown by negative culture results.
  • In the dog, wound area reduced by ~4.2× over 10 days; healing completed by day 67 with no further antibiotic therapy.
  • In the cat, wound area reduced by ~2.5× over 17 days; healing completed by day 47 without systemic antibiotics.
  • PEDs function via direct current (DC) stimulation, believed to generate hypochlorous acid (HOCl) with antibacterial properties.
  • No side effects or adverse tissue reactions were observed in either case, supporting biocompatibility.
  • Multidrug-resistant organisms (e.g., S. pseudintermedius, S. canis, S. epidermidis) were eradicated by PED treatment.
  • PED therapy may reduce reliance on antibiotics and surgery, offering a novel adjunct for chronic, infected wounds.

Heald

Veterinary Surgery

3

2022

Electroceutical treatment of infected chronic wounds in a dog and a cat

2022-3-VS-heald-4

Article Title: Electroceutical treatment of infected chronic wounds in a dog and a cat

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Rocheleau 2024 et al., on arthroscopic meniscal suturing, how were failed meniscal repairs managed?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All failed repairs were managed arthroscopically with good outcomes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Arthroscopic meniscectomy.
All failed repairs were managed arthroscopically with good outcomes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Arthroscopic meniscal suturing was performed in 43 client-owned dogs, involving 44 meniscal repairs (one dog was bilateral). All injuries involved the caudal horn of the medial meniscus and were associated with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) disease.
  • All dogs underwent simultaneous TPLO, with some also receiving an internal brace (IB). Most repairs used simple vertical mattress sutures.
  • The overall complication rate was 34.1% (15/44). Most complications were attributed to the TPLO/TPLO+IB and did not compromise the meniscal repair outcome.
  • No median time to “acceptable” or “full” function was reported, but most dogs showed improvement in lameness and LOAD scores (p < .001), indicating good to excellent outcomes.
  • Meniscal repair success rate was 88% (38/44), with TPLO + IB outperforming TPLO-only (93.3% vs 71.4%). Follow-up was performed at 8 weeks (40 dogs) and 6 months (16 dogs).
  • Six failures occurred, all managed with arthroscopic meniscectomy, leading to normal activity in those dogs. Two IB-associated failures led to CrCL instability.
  • The authors concluded the technique was safe, practical, and effective, with a reasonable complication rate.
  • The findings support arthroscopic suturing as a feasible alternative to meniscectomy or meniscal release, offering long-term benefits for preserving the meniscus.

Rocheleau

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

2024-5-VS-rocheleau-4

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.