Your Custom Quiz

In Brockman 2025 et al., on canine mitral valve repair outcomes, what was the most common cause of death in dogs that did not survive?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Among 25 non-survivors, the most frequent cause of death was inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Failure to wean from CPB.
Among 25 non-survivors, the most frequent cause of death was inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Overall survival to discharge: 107 of 132 dogs (81%)
  • Quartile improvement: Survival increased steadily from 67% in Q1 to 91% in Q4
    • Q1: 22/33 survived
    • Q2: 27/33
    • Q3: 28/33
    • Q4: 30/33
  • Statistical significance: Higher operative rank significantly associated with improved survival (p < .05)
  • Median cross clamp time (XCT): 73 min (range 40–165), but increased again in Q4
  • Fatalities (n=25) were often due to:
    • Failure to wean from CPB
    • Intracranial vascular events (stroke)
    • Intrathoracic hemorrhage
  • Breed representation: CKCS (23.5%), Chihuahua (22%), Crossbreeds (21%)
  • Stages of MMVD: Stage C (67%), Stage D (27%), Stage B2 (6%)
  • Emphasis on deliberate multidisciplinary teamwork for outcome improvement
  • Highlights importance of technical and non-technical team skills, procedural standardization, and consistent personnel

Brockman

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Improvement in short‐term outcome over time, in a single center embarking on a canine mitral valve repair program using a structured multidisciplinary approach

2025-4-VS-brockman-4

Article Title: Improvement in short‐term outcome over time, in a single center embarking on a canine mitral valve repair program using a structured multidisciplinary approach

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Williams 2024 et al., on hemorrhage scoring, which semi-quantitative hemorrhage score was most associated with adrenaline use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Five dogs in Group A (adrenaline) were assigned Score 1, whereas none in Group NA were. This difference was statistically significant (p = .029).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Score 1 (virtually none).
Five dogs in Group A (adrenaline) were assigned Score 1, whereas none in Group NA were. This difference was statistically significant (p = .029).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
  • Population: 32 brachycephalic dogs undergoing cut-and-sew sharp staphylectomy
  • Groups: Adrenaline + lidocaine (Group A) vs. Lidocaine only (Group NA)
  • Main Findings:
    • Total hemorrhage significantly lower in Group A (median 1.82 g) vs Group NA (7.95 g); p = .013
    • Normalized hemorrhage significantly lower in Group A; p = .021
    • Surgeon-assigned hemorrhage scores significantly lower in Group A; p = .029
    • No adverse effects (tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia, etc.) noted from adrenaline use
    • Breed effect: English Bulldogs bled more overall even after normalization
  • Clinical Implication: Adrenaline in nerve blocks reduces hemorrhage without added risk

Williams

Veterinary Surgery

1

2024

Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

2024-1-VS-williams-2

Article Title: Evaluation of the addition of adrenaline in a bilateral maxillary nerve block to reduce hemorrhage in dogs undergoing sharp staphylectomy for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome. A prospective, randomized study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Swieton 2025 et al., on portocaval shunts, what was the perioperative mortality rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only one dog died in the perioperative period, resulting in a 5% mortality rate.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 5%.
Only one dog died in the perioperative period, resulting in a 5% mortality rate.

🔍 Key Findings

Study population: 21 dogs with portocaval extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (EHPSS)
Surgical approach: 67% (14/21) underwent ameroid constrictor placement
Perioperative complications: 4 dogs (19%), including seizures (n = 2), vomiting, and abdominal effusion
Perioperative mortality: 1 dog (5%)
Postoperative clinical outcome:

  • Good to excellent outcome: 81% (17/21)
  • Median follow-up: 6 months (range 3–43)

Persistence of shunting (CT or US): 56% (9/16 evaluated)
Dogs with persistent shunting: 67% still had good to excellent clinical outcome
Congenital portocaval shunts may have more favorable outcomes than previously reported

Swieton

Veterinary Surgery

2

2025

Outcome of 21 dogs treated for the portocaval subtype of extrahepatic portosystemic shunt

2025-2-VS-swieton-5

Article Title: Outcome of 21 dogs treated for the portocaval subtype of extrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Scheuermann 2024 et al., on 3D-printed reduction guides for tibial fractures, what was the most common plane for angular pin-guide placement error?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Axial plane showed the highest angular discrepancies for both proximal and distal pin guides.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Axial.
Axial plane showed the highest angular discrepancies for both proximal and distal pin guides.

🔍 Key Findings

  • The study was a prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed, patient-specific reduction system for aligning diaphyseal tibial fractures stabilized using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in fifteen client-owned dogs.
  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and fabrication were feasible within a clinically relevant timeframe, with a mean of 50.7 hours. Surgical efficiency improved with experience.
  • Pin-guide placement was accurate, with median translational discrepancies of 2.7 mm (proximal) and 2.9 mm (distal), and angular discrepancies highest in the axial plane.
  • The proximal guide was easier to apply (median Likert score: 8) than the distal guide (median: 6).
  • The 3D-printed system enabled near-anatomic reduction in 87% of cases and acceptable reduction in the remaining 13%; no unacceptable reductions occurred.
  • Postoperative alignment and tibial length were well-restored, with all dogs within 5° or 5 mm of contralateral measurements.
  • Temporary circular fixation was occasionally used to assist reduction and improve alignment.
  • Precontoured plates fit easily, with a median Likert score of 9; total surgical time was shorter than conventional MIPO at the institution.
  • The study lacked a control group but builds on prior cadaveric feasibility work.

Scheuermann

Veterinary Surgery

6

2024

Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model

2024-6-VS-scheuermann1-1

Article Title: Efficacy of virtual surgical planning and a three‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide for canine segmental mandibular reconstruction in a cadaver model

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Antonakakis 2022 et al., on telovelar tumor resection, what postoperative imaging finding confirmed complete resection of the tumor?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative MRI showed the fourth ventricle was filled with fluid and no residual mass.
Incorrect. The correct answer is MRI showing fluid-filled fourth ventricle.
Postoperative MRI showed the fourth ventricle was filled with fluid and no residual mass.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Telovelar approach enabled complete resection of a fourth ventricle choroid plexus tumor in a dog without postoperative complications.
  • Postoperative MRI confirmed gross total tumor removal, and the dog remained neurologically normal 28 months post-surgery.
  • The tela choroidea was used as a surgical landmark and incised to allow atraumatic access to the tumor.
  • Cerebellum was spared using this technique, minimizing risk of cerebellar injury (e.g., cerebellar mutism).
  • No hemorrhagic complications were noted during surgery due to dissection through avascular planes.
  • Histopathology favored choroid plexus carcinoma based on mitotic index (9/10 HPFs), though definitive diagnosis remained pending.
  • The case highlights the utility of telovelar over transvermian approach, given its minimally traumatic nature and improved exposure.
  • Survival beyond 2 years without adjunctive therapy suggests surgical excision alone may be curative in select cases.

Antonakakis

Veterinary Surgery

8

2022

Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

2022-8-VS-antonakakis-2

Article Title: Use of a telovelar approach for complete resection of a choroid plexus tumor in a dog

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Low 2025 et al., on machine-learning outcomes in IVDE, which factor was associated with improved functional recovery?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Fenestration was among the top predictive features associated with better recovery.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Fenestration performed.
Fenestration was among the top predictive features associated with better recovery.

🔍 Key Findings

The study included 162 deep-pain-negative dogs undergoing decompressive surgery (hemilaminectomy) for acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE).

Ambulatory recovery occurred in 53.1% of dogs (86/162).

The best performing machine-learning model was XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.9502 and accuracy of 89.1%, outperforming Ridge, AdaBoost, and Naive Bayes models.

Preoperative-only XGBoost models were less accurate, with AUC dropping to 0.8271 and accuracy to 71.9%.

Top predictive features (by SHAP analysis) included:

  1. T2-weighted to L2 spinal cord signal ratio (lower values predicted better outcome)
  2. Use of fenestration (presence associated with better recovery)
  3. Hospitalization duration
  4. Imaging modality used
  5. Duration of nonambulatory status

Machine learning provided better insight into prognostic factors than traditional statistical methods.

Low

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion

2025-4-VS-low-4

Article Title: Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Adair 2023 et al., on PCCLm vs. open cystotomy, what factor increased the odds of surgical site infection/inflammation in the PCCLm group?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Incision extension (not for other procedures) increased SSII risk (OR 18.76, p = .027).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Incision extension for exposure.
Incision extension (not for other procedures) increased SSII risk (OR 18.76, p = .027).

🔍 Key Findings

  • PCCLm resulted in significantly fewer postoperative lower urinary tract signs compared to OC (13.0% vs 60.9%, p <.001).
  • Incomplete urolith removal was not significantly different between PCCLm and OC (11.4% vs 20%, p = .112).
  • PCCLm had significantly shorter anesthesia times than OC when no concurrent procedures were performed (97.5 vs 120 min, p < .001).
  • Surgical site infection/inflammation (SSII) rates were low and not significantly different between groups (4.5% PCCLm vs 1.8% OC).
  • Dogs undergoing PCCLm were more frequently discharged same-day (84.7% vs 0% in OC), reflecting faster recovery.
  • PCCLm had higher intraoperative complication rates (22.1% vs 3.4%), mostly due to incision extension or conversions.
  • Time to additional surgery for urolith recurrence was longer in PCCLm dogs (24 vs 11.5 months, p = .004).
  • Calcium oxalate uroliths were more prevalent in PCCLm cases, while OC had more struvite or mixed types.

Adair

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

2023-7-VS-adair-4

Article Title: Retrospective comparison of modified percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCLm) and traditional open cystotomy (OC) in dogs: 218 cases (2010–2019)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bilmont 2025 et al., on cup version comparison, which variable most affected open face version without significantly changing truncated face version?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cup inclination caused open face version to increase linearly, while truncated face version remained relatively stable.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cup inclination.
Cup inclination caused open face version to increase linearly, while truncated face version remained relatively stable.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Open face version was significantly greater than truncated face version by 14°–22° (p <.001).
  • Open face version increased linearly with inclination and pelvic extension, while truncated face version remained largely stable.
  • Truncated face version is an unreliable surrogate for open face version.
  • Accurate interpretation of cup version should include both truncated face version and inclination.
  • Canine 3D pelvic model and CT-based simulation used for all measurements.

Bilmont

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Assessment of BFX cup version in a three-dimensional model simulating the ventrodorsal radiographic view

2025-1-VS-bilmont-2

Article Title: Assessment of BFX cup version in a three-dimensional model simulating the ventrodorsal radiographic view

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Sullivan 2025 et al., on TTT stabilization methods, which stabilization method showed significantly different failure force or stiffness?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. All methods showed comparable failure force and stiffness.
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant differences were found.
All methods showed comparable failure force and stiffness.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Spacer pin fixation showed no difference in failure force or stiffness compared to tension band wire (TBW) or 2-pin techniques.
  • All constructs failed under loads >1000 N, exceeding estimated peak quadriceps force in dogs during walking (~240 N).
  • Patellar ligament failure was the most common mode of failure across all groups (5–8 samples per group).
  • Distal tibial crest fractures were seen only in 2-pin and spacer pin groups, not in TBW group, suggesting TBW may protect against crest failure.
  • No failures occurred at pin tracts, possibly due to pin placement within patellar ligament footprint.
  • Spacer pin technique avoids placing pins through the tuberosity, potentially reducing risks of soft tissue complications like tendinopathy or irritation.
  • Use of partial osteotomy with robust distal crest may substitute for TBW without compromising initial mechanical strength.
  • Further in vivo or cyclic loading studies are required, as this cadaveric study tested only acute tensile failure.

Sullivan

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

2025-3-VCOT-sullivan-1

Article Title: Biomechanical Comparison of Spacer Pin Fixation to Two Established Methods of Tibial Tuberosity Transposition Stabilization in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Pfeil 2024 et al., on fluoroscopic pinning, what was the median time to radiographic bone union?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Median healing time was 6 weeks, with a range of 4–12 weeks.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 6 weeks.
Median healing time was 6 weeks, with a range of 4–12 weeks.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fluoroscopically guided normograde metabone pinning (FGNMP) was used to treat 17 animals (15 dogs and 2 cats) with 57 metabone fractures, including various fracture configurations (short-oblique body, physeal, and comminuted).
  • All 57 fractures were stabilized using intramedullary pins via FGNMP. The study exclusively focused on pin fixation and did not include screws or combined fixation techniques.
  • Median surgical time was 54 minutes (range 26–99 min), indicating efficient procedural execution.
  • Radiographic bone union was achieved in all fractures, with a median time to union of 6 weeks (range 4–12 weeks). Union was confirmed in all initially non-united fractures on follow-up.
  • No major complications were reported. A single pressure sore at the olecranon resolved uneventfully, and no pin migration or osteomyelitis was observed.
  • Pin extensions were noted radiographically (e.g., 42% distal subchondral overextension), but were not associated with clinical problems.
  • Fluoroscopic guidance improved implant accuracy and preserved soft tissue, enabling effective fracture alignment and stabilization using this minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIO) approach.
  • The authors concluded that FGNMP is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive method for a variety of metabone fracture types, yielding quick recovery, fast healing, and good to excellent long-term functional outcomes in all 17 cases.

Pfeil

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Outcomes of 15 dogs and two cats with metabone fractures treated with fluoroscopically guided normograde metabone pinning

2024-5-VS-pfeil-2

Article Title: Outcomes of 15 dogs and two cats with metabone fractures treated with fluoroscopically guided normograde metabone pinning

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.