Your Custom Quiz

In Kuvaldina 2023 et al., on endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy, what structure must be carefully preserved during dissection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The thoracodorsal nerve was consistently identified and preserved to avoid functional loss.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Thoracodorsal nerve bundle.
The thoracodorsal nerve was consistently identified and preserved to avoid functional loss.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Endoscopic excisional biopsy of axillary lymph nodes was successfully performed in cadavers and clinical dogs with minimal complications.
  • The technique used a SILS port and CO₂ insufflation through a small incision between the latissimus dorsi and superficial pectorals.
  • In 4 cadavers (6 limbs), mean time to remove axillary nodes was 33 minutes, and single nodes were found in 5/6 limbs.
  • In 3 clinical dogs, the procedure was successful in 2 cases; 1 required conversion to open surgery due to difficulty manipulating the node.
  • Accessory axillary nodes were successfully excised when present, located adherent to deep latissimus dorsi.
  • No cases developed lymphedema, pneumothorax, or major complications postoperatively.
  • Subjective benefits included better visualization, reduced dissection, and less postoperative morbidity than open techniques.
  • Study suggests MIS lymphadenectomy may improve staging accuracy and reduce complications, though larger studies are needed.

Kuvaldina

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

2023-6-VS-kuvaldina-3-9e740

Article Title: Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Kuvaldina 2023 et al., in Minimally invasive axillary lymphadenectomy in dogs, which of the following best describes postoperative morbidity in the 3 clinical patients?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Postoperative morbidity was minimal; all clinical cases recovered uneventfully with no major complications.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Minor seroma or lameness resolved without intervention.
Postoperative morbidity was minimal; all clinical cases recovered uneventfully with no major complications.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A minimally invasive endoscopic technique was successfully developed for excisional biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in dogs.
  • The procedure was performed on 4 cadavers (6 limbs) and 3 clinical patients, with no major complications reported.
  • Mean cadaveric time: accessory axillary node 5.1 min; axillary node 33 min. One limb had a double axillary node.
  • In clinical cases, 2/3 were completed endoscopically; one required conversion to open due to node elevation difficulty.
  • Surgical times in clinical cases ranged from 35 to 58 minutes, depending on node accessibility and number.
  • Postoperative morbidity was minimal: no lymphedema, minor seroma or lameness resolved quickly.
  • The SILS port approach enabled effective access, though precise placement was critical to visualization.
  • This is the first reported veterinary endoscopic technique for axillary lymphadenectomy; potential for improved staging and reduced morbidity.

Kuvaldina

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

2023-7-VS-kuvaldina-4

Article Title: Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Gutbrod 2024 et al., on feline tibial stabilization, how did the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin construct perform compared to others?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group 1 had significantly inferior yield point and failure load versus groups 2 and 3.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lowest stiffness and axial force.
Group 1 had significantly inferior yield point and failure load versus groups 2 and 3.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 2.4 mm LCP with a 1.6 mm IM pin had the highest axial stiffness and yield strength among the tested constructs.
  • Axial stiffness was significantly higher in the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm IM pin group compared to 2.7 mm LCP alone (p = .013).
  • No significant difference in torsional stiffness was found among groups.
  • 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin had the lowest stiffness and failure load, underperforming both other constructs.
  • All constructs failed via valgus bending, consistent with clinical observations in feline tibial fractures.
  • A 1.6 mm pin (~50% canal fill) resulted in superior construct performance vs. 1.0 mm (~30% fill).
  • Group 2 (2.4 LCP + 1.6 mm pin) outperformed the 2.7 mm LCP alone in stiffness, despite using a smaller plate.
  • Plate–rod constructs may better preserve periosteal blood supply and support minimally invasive stabilization strategies.

Gutbrod

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

2024-4-VS-gutbrod-4

Article Title: Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Haine 2022 et al., on outcomes in canine limb tumors, what was the overall R1 rate following planned narrow excision for soft tissue sarcomas?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. STSs had a 42% R1 rate vs 26% for MCTs in the study.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 42%.
STSs had a 42% R1 rate vs 26% for MCTs in the study.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Fewer R1 margins (tumor on ink) were achieved in mast cell tumors (MCTs) when using 6–10 mm lateral margins versus 0–5 mm (7% vs. 55%; _P_ = .049).
  • For soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), no benefit was seen in margin completeness between 0–5 mm vs. 6–10 mm lateral margins (41% vs. 43% R1).
  • Overall R1 rates were 26% for MCTs and 42% for STSs following PNE.
  • R scheme (“tumor on ink” = R1) had better interobserver agreement (83%) compared to ≤1 mm margin criteria (68% agreement).
  • Complication rate was moderate (26%), but no surgeries required revision.
  • Local recurrence/metastasis occurred in 14% of dogs, with 60% of those having R1 margins.
  • Adjunctive therapy was considered clinically indicated in 46% of 0–5 mm margin cases vs. 24% of 6–10 mm cases.
  • Histologic grade and tumor size were not predictive of margin completeness.

Haine

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

2022-7-VS-haine-3

Article Title: Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Logothetou 2024 et al., on SPF complications, which anatomic site for SPF reconstruction was associated with the fewest complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Flaps on the head had significantly fewer complications compared to other regions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Head.
Flaps on the head had significantly fewer complications compared to other regions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Complication rate for subdermal plexus flaps (SPFs) in dogs was 53.6%.
  • Skin staples had a numerically higher complication rate (72.2%) than sutures (49.3%), but not statistically significant due to small sample size.
  • Most common complication was wound dehiscence (35%), followed by seroma (14%) and wound discharge (14%).
  • Increased body weight was significantly associated with higher complication risk (OR = 1.056 per kg; p = .029).
  • Advancement flaps were associated with a lower incidence of complications on univariable analysis (p < .001).
  • Head region flap closures had fewer complications, while proximal pelvic limb closures had the highest complication rate.
  • Age was a risk factor—each additional year increased odds of complications (OR = 1.019; p = .004).
  • Closure technique did not significantly influence complication severity, though staple use was numerically worse.

Logothetou

Veterinary Surgery

3

2024

Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

2024-3-VS-logothetou-3

Article Title: Complications and influence of cutaneous closure technique on subdermal plexus flaps in 97 dogs (2006–2022)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Levine 2025 et al., on thoracoscopic pericardiectomy, which approach may offer benefit when paired with thoracic duct ligation (TDL)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. ILR improves efficiency and could facilitate simultaneous TDL.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ILR.
ILR improves efficiency and could facilitate simultaneous TDL.

🔍 Key Findings

Study design: Randomized cadaveric comparison (n=20 dogs; ILR vs PDR)

Approaches:

  • ILR = Intercostal in Left Lateral Recumbency (no OLV required)
  • PDR = Paraxiphoid in Dorsal Recumbency (traditional)

Outcomes:

  • Pericardiectomy time was shorter for ILR (p = .045)
  • Pericardial fragment size was significantly larger in PDR group (p = .004; 23.21 cm² difference)
  • Visibility and cardiac exposure were superior in PDR group

Feasibility:

  • ILR approach was consistently successful in achieving partial pericardiectomy
  • Bilateral ventilation was adequate; no need for OLV

Clinical relevance:

  • ILR may improve efficiency when paired with TDL
  • PDR remains preferable for cases requiring maximal pericardial resection

Levine

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

Intercostal thoracoscopic pericardiectomy in left lateral recumbency: A cadaveric study of feasibility, efficiency, and extent of pericardial resection

2025-1-VS-levine-5

Article Title: Intercostal thoracoscopic pericardiectomy in left lateral recumbency: A cadaveric study of feasibility, efficiency, and extent of pericardial resection

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Muroi 2025 et al., on refracture risk, what factor was significantly associated with refracture in dogs **retaining plates**?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. In the non-removal group, greater positional change of the distal screw (OR 1.79, p=0.04) was linked to refracture.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Amount of position change of the most distal screw.
In the non-removal group, greater positional change of the distal screw (OR 1.79, p=0.04) was linked to refracture.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Refracture occurred in 5.5% of limbs, with higher incidence in the plate removal group (12.5%) vs. non-removal (3.5%).
  • In the non-plate removal group, refractures occurred at the most distal screw site, linked to greater screw position change during growth (OR 1.79, p=0.04).
  • Screw-to-bone diameter ratio (SBDR) >0.4 was a significant risk factor for refracture in the plate retention group.
  • In the plate removal group, refractures occurred at the original fracture site, associated with lower pixel value ratio (bone mineral density) and reduced radial thickness.
  • Implant-induced osteoporosis (IIO) beneath the plate likely contributed to refracture risk after plate removal.
  • Younger age at fracture (<6 months) was associated with higher refracture risk due to ongoing radial growth and shifting screw position.
  • No significant association was found between refracture and plate type (locking vs conventional), fixation method, or ulnar union.
  • Recommendations include careful SBDR sizing, motion restriction, and cautious plate removal decisions in growing dogs.

Muroi

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2025

A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors Associated with Refracture after Repair of Radial–Ulnar Fractures in Small-Breed Dogs

2025-2-VCOT-muroi-1

Article Title: A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors Associated with Refracture after Repair of Radial–Ulnar Fractures in Small-Breed Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, which phase of contrast-enhanced CT was most helpful in localization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Both were reported as useful in roughly 30–38% of cases.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Both portal and hepatic venous.
Both were reported as useful in roughly 30–38% of cases.

🔍 Key Findings

  • CT localization of liver masses was more accurate by division (88%) than by lobe (74.3%)
  • Inter-radiologist agreement was excellent for division (kappa up to 0.885) and only moderate–good for lobe
  • Quadrate and right lateral lobes had significantly lower localization accuracy compared to left lateral or medial lobes
  • CT localization of the left division was most accurate (90.1%) compared to central (77.1%) and right (88.3%)
  • Portal and hepatic venous phases were equally helpful for localization (each ~30–38% usefulness)
  • No significant associations found between histopathologic diagnosis and localization accuracy
  • Lobe-level CT localization should be interpreted with caution, especially for the quadrate and right lateral lobes
  • Radiologist experience likely influenced accuracy, with the most experienced radiologist performing best

Thomsen

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board-certified radiologists

2024-7-VS-thomsen-3

Article Title: Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board-certified radiologists

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Evers 2023 et al., on needle arthroscopy for meniscal tears, what was the mean duration of needle arthroscopy procedures?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Needle arthroscopy took 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly faster than standard arthroscopy.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 8 minutes.
Needle arthroscopy took 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly faster than standard arthroscopy.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Needle arthroscopy (NA) had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears in dogs with CCLR.
  • NA missed 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscal tear, both nondisplaced and stable.
  • Visibility of all meniscal horns was significantly lower with NA compared to standard arthroscopy (SA) (P < .005 for all horns).
  • Probing the caudal horn of the lateral meniscus was significantly more difficult with NA (P = .0017), though medial horn probing was similar.
  • Mean NA procedure time was 8 ± 3 minutes, significantly shorter than SA (15 ± 9 min, P = .0041).
  • No increase in lameness observed after NA, indicating minimal procedural morbidity.
  • NA was performed under sedation in most dogs, though 10/26 required additional chemical restraint or short anesthesia.
  • NA was most accurate for displaced vertical longitudinal tears, with all 14 correctly identified; one stable tear and a lateral tear were missed.

Evers

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

2023-6-VS-evers-4

Article Title: Accuracy of needle arthroscopy for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Poggi 2024 et al., on laparoscopic resection of pancreatic masses in dogs, what was the median operative time for laparoscopic pancreatic mass resection?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The reported median surgical duration was 69 minutes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 69 minutes.
The reported median surgical duration was 69 minutes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Laparoscopic pancreatic mass resection (LPMR) was successfully performed in all 12 dogs, with no conversion to open laparotomy required.
  • Median operative time was 69 minutes (range 35–100 min); 11/12 dogs were discharged within 48 hours, and one was discharged after 7 days.
  • No major intraoperative complications occurred; minor complications included mild bleeding (2/12) and cannula malfunction (1/12).
  • All dogs survived the procedure and were discharged.
  • Histopathology confirmed neoplasia in all dogs: 9 insulinomas and 3 pancreatic carcinomas; all tumors were completely excised with clear margins.
  • No recurrences were reported; 3 dogs died of unrelated causes, and 9 were still alive at the time of reporting.
  • No postoperative hypoglycemia was observed; 1 dog had transient hyperglycemia, and minor complications included vomiting, idiopathic seizures, and pancreatitis, all of which resolved.
  • Authors concluded that LPMR is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for selected distal pancreatic masses in dogs.

Poggi

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic masses in 12 dogs

2024-5-VS-poggi-3

Article Title: Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic masses in 12 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.