Your Custom Quiz

In Marshall 2022 et al., on fracture healing in dogs, how did **radius and ulna fractures in toy breeds** perform regarding delayed or non-union?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no increased odds of poor healing in toy breed radius/ulna fractures.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Were no more likely to result in delayed or non-union.
The study found no increased odds of poor healing in toy breed radius/ulna fractures.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Delayed union occurred in 13.9% of fractures; non-union in 4.6%; mal-union in 0.7%
  • Major implant failure increased odds of delayed or non-union by 12.9×
  • Surgical site infection increased risk 3.2×; bone grafting (any type) was also associated (OR 3.3)
  • Comminuted fractures had 4.2× greater odds of delayed or non-union
  • Older age increased risk, with odds increasing by 21% per year
  • Radius and ulna fractures in toy breeds were not high risk, contrary to historical belief
  • Most non-unions required revision surgery with rhBMP-2 or autograft to achieve union
  • Ilium fractures showed 0% delayed/non-union — possibly due to robust muscle envelope

Marshall

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs

2022-7-VS-marshall-2

Article Title: Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Gutbrod 2024 et al., on feline tibial stabilization, what intramedullary pin diameter was associated with the highest biomechanical performance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Group 2 used a 1.6 mm pin filling ~50% of the tibial canal, yielding superior stiffness.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 1.6 mm (50% fill).
Group 2 used a 1.6 mm pin filling ~50% of the tibial canal, yielding superior stiffness.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 2.4 mm LCP with a 1.6 mm IM pin had the highest axial stiffness and yield strength among the tested constructs.
  • Axial stiffness was significantly higher in the 2.4 mm LCP + 1.6 mm IM pin group compared to 2.7 mm LCP alone (p = .013).
  • No significant difference in torsional stiffness was found among groups.
  • 2.4 mm LCP + 1.0 mm pin had the lowest stiffness and failure load, underperforming both other constructs.
  • All constructs failed via valgus bending, consistent with clinical observations in feline tibial fractures.
  • A 1.6 mm pin (~50% canal fill) resulted in superior construct performance vs. 1.0 mm (~30% fill).
  • Group 2 (2.4 LCP + 1.6 mm pin) outperformed the 2.7 mm LCP alone in stiffness, despite using a smaller plate.
  • Plate–rod constructs may better preserve periosteal blood supply and support minimally invasive stabilization strategies.

Gutbrod

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

2024-4-VS-gutbrod-3

Article Title: Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of 2.4 mm LCP plate rod constructs versus 2.7 mm LCP applied to the feline tibia

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Aldrich 2023 et al., on liposomal bupivacaine in TPLO, which metric showed no significant difference between treatment and placebo groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.
Incorrect. The correct answer is CMPS-SF pain scores.
CMPS-SF scores did not differ significantly between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo groups at any time point.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration did not reduce the need for rescue analgesia compared with placebo in dogs undergoing TPLO.
  • CMPS-SF pain scores were not significantly different between LB and placebo groups at any postoperative time point.
  • % body weight distribution (%BWdist) to the operated limb did not differ significantly between treatment groups across all time points.
  • No correlation was found between CMPS-SF scores and %BWdist, suggesting these metrics assess different aspects of postoperative pain.
  • Postoperative carprofen administration was standardized, and LB did not provide additional detectable analgesic benefit.
  • Three-layer infiltration technique (joint capsule, fascia, subcutis) was used consistently across all cases.
  • Adverse events were minor and comparable between LB and placebo groups.
  • Post hoc analysis suggested a much larger sample size (58–436 dogs) would be needed to detect significant differences in %BWdist.

Aldrich

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

2023-5-VS-aldrich-1

Article Title: Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of bupivacaine liposomal suspension using static bodyweight distribution and subjective pain scoring in dogs after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy surgery

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Zann 2023 et al., In Long-term outcomes after proximal humeral OC debridement in dogs, what difference was noted in affected limbs compared to contralateral limbs in unilaterally affected dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. OC limbs showed measurable atrophy and reduced ROM compared to contralateral healthy limbs.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Decreased brachial circumference and extension.
OC limbs showed measurable atrophy and reduced ROM compared to contralateral healthy limbs.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 20 dogs (26 shoulders) evaluated at mean 3.5 years post-surgery after arthroscopic or open debridement.
  • Ipsilateral muscle atrophy and decreased range of motion (↓ extension, ↓ flexion) in affected limbs compared to contralateral healthy shoulders.
  • All treated shoulders developed osteoarthritis, confirmed radiographically, by CT, and arthroscopically.
  • Moderate to severe synovitis was present in all shoulders; lesions showed patchy, incomplete cartilage infilling even up to 8.9 years post-op.
  • Kinetic gait analysis showed no significant differences in PVF/VI between affected and unaffected limbs, despite mild lameness clinically.
  • Owners reported good to very good mobility (median LOAD = 6), often underestimating clinical lameness.
  • CT detected larger lesion dimensions than radiographs (wider, deeper defects).
  • Despite progression of OA, surgical debridement was associated with satisfactory long-term function, though not prevention of degenerative changes.

Zann

Veterinary Surgery

7

2023

Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

2023-7-VS-zann-4

Article Title: Long-term outcome of dogs treated by surgical debridement of proximal humeral osteochondrosis

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Philips 2025 et al., on radiographic IAIP detection, which implant direction was more likely to be misclassified as penetrating the joint?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle were misclassified more often (23.8%).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lateral condyle at −2 mm.
Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle were misclassified more often (23.8%).

🔍 Key Findings

Overall accuracy of radiography to detect IAIP: 77.9%

Sensitivity: 97.2%
Specificity: 67.6%

False positive rate: 32.4% of non-penetrating implants were misclassified as penetrating

Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle had higher misclassification (23.8%) than medial (8.3%)

Most accurate detection: Implants placed 2 mm into the joint (97.2% correct classification)

Least agreement: For implants placed at 0 mm (subchondral level), especially lateral (AC1 = 0.48)

No palpable abnormalities (e.g., crepitus) observed during ROM for any group

No significant difference in detection by specialty field or reviewer qualification

Suggests radiographic misclassification risk and supports considering CT/fluoroscopy in equivocal cases

Philips

Veterinary Surgery

3

2025

Detection of intra‐articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study

2025-3-VS-philips-4

Article Title: Detection of intra‐articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Crystal 2024 et al., on elbow osteotomies, which variable most significantly predicted reduced medial elbow load?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Osteotomy angle had the greatest impact (1.08 unit decrease per 1° angle; p = 0.0002).
Incorrect. The correct answer is Osteotomy angle.
Osteotomy angle had the greatest impact (1.08 unit decrease per 1° angle; p = 0.0002).

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Ex vivo cadaver study using 5 paired canine thoracic limbs
  • Compared medial opening wedge osteotomy (MOWO) and external rotational osteotomy (ERO) of the humerus
  • Measured pressure changes in the medial compartment using thin-film sensors
  • ERO significantly reduced peak pressure and pressure distribution in the medial elbow compartment (p < 0.05)
  • MOWO showed no significant pressure reduction relative to native state
  • Combined MOWO + ERO did not significantly improve over ERO alone
  • Findings support the biomechanical rationale for ERO as a surgical strategy to offload the medial compartment in cases like medial compartment disease (MCD)

Crystal

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

4

2024

Effect of Medial Opening Wedge and External Rotational Humeral Osteotomies on Medial Elbow Compartment Pressure: An Ex Vivo Study

2024-4-VCOT-crystal-5

Article Title: Effect of Medial Opening Wedge and External Rotational Humeral Osteotomies on Medial Elbow Compartment Pressure: An Ex Vivo Study

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Alvarez 2022 et al., on rehabilitation modalities, what was the outcome of the single study on low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS)?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The LIPUS study (Kieves 2018) showed no significant improvement in radiographic healing or TPI outcomes after TPLO.
Incorrect. The correct answer is It had no significant effect on healing or function.
The LIPUS study (Kieves 2018) showed no significant improvement in radiographic healing or TPI outcomes after TPLO.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Exercise-based rehabilitation showed benefits in 6 of 7 studies, including increased peak vertical force (PVF) and reduced lameness, though most had high risk of bias (RoB).
  • Cold compression therapy (CCT) had 2 high-quality (Level II, low RoB) studies showing improvements in pain scores, range of motion, and swelling, supporting its clinical use.
  • Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was supported by 2 Level II studies; only one had low RoB, showing short-term benefits in patellar ligament thickness and PVF, but no long-term benefit on bone healing.
  • Photobiomodulation (PBM) had mixed results across 3 Level II studies (all low RoB); only 1 showed positive impact on PVF, limiting its recommendation.
  • Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) showed no significant impact on gait analysis or bone healing in a Level II, low RoB study.
  • Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improved lameness and thigh circumference in one Level III study, but had high-moderate RoB and involved experimentally-induced CCL rupture, limiting clinical relevance.
  • No modality beyond exercise and CCT had consistent or strong evidence for efficacy in post-TPLO or extracapsular repair rehabilitation.
  • The absence of standardized protocols, small sample sizes, and inconsistent outcome measures limited the generalizability of findings.

Alvarez

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

2022-2-VS-alvarez-5

Article Title: Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Raleigh 2022 et al., on pericardiectomy complications, what preoperative finding may serve as a warning sign for intraoperative VF?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 7 of 16 dogs had arrhythmias (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia) before VF occurred.
Incorrect. The correct answer is ECG-detected arrhythmias.
7 of 16 dogs had arrhythmias (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia) before VF occurred.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 3% of pericardiectomy cases across reporting institutions.
  • 14 of 16 dogs (88%) that developed intraoperative VF died, indicating high mortality.
  • Electrosurgical devices were used in 15/16 dogs; VF onset coincided with their use in 8 dogs, suggesting a potential but unproven association.
  • Preoperative arrhythmias were seen in 7 dogs (e.g., VPCs, VT, bradycardia), possibly serving as early warning signs.
  • Thoracoscopic approach was used in 75% of cases; however, conversion to open surgery was required in 9/13 thoracoscopic procedures after VF onset.
  • Defibrillation was attempted in 13 dogs, but only 3 converted to sinus rhythm, and only 2 survived postoperatively.
  • VF may result from stray current or cardiac manipulation; bipolar energy devices were implicated despite lower theoretical risk.
  • Preventative strategies include judicious electrosurgery use, close ECG monitoring, rapid CPR preparedness, and preop cardiac risk assessment.

Raleigh

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

The development of ventricular fibrillation as a complication of pericardiectomy in 16 dogs

2022-4-VS-raleigh-4

Article Title: The development of ventricular fibrillation as a complication of pericardiectomy in 16 dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Matz 2022 et al., on stapler size comparison, what is the clinical significance of the finding that all stapler groups had ILPs exceeding 25 mmHg?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study used 25 mmHg as a reference threshold; all stapler groups exceeded this, suggesting functional closure under physiological conditions.
Incorrect. The correct answer is They exceed normal intraluminal pressures in dogs.
The study used 25 mmHg as a reference threshold; all stapler groups exceeded this, suggesting functional closure under physiological conditions.

🔍 Key Findings

  • No significant difference in initial leak pressure (ILP) among TA 30 V3 2.5 mm, TA 60 3.5 mm, and TA 60 4.8 mm stapler sizes (P = .78).
  • All stapler types exceeded the physiological intraluminal pressure threshold (~25 mmHg), suggesting acceptable leak resistance.
  • Mean ILPs: TA 30 V3 (181.5 mmHg), TA 60 3.5 mm (112 mmHg), TA 60 4.8 mm (77.2 mmHg).
  • Leakage occurred at the staple line in 23 of 24 specimens; only one had ileal wall rupture.
  • No correlation found between ILP and cadaver weight, cecal wall thickness, or cecal length.
  • Cecal wall thickness averaged 4.9 mm, yet staple heights ranged only from 1.0–2.0 mm.
  • One specimen in each TA 60 group leaked near or below physiologic pressures, suggesting rare outliers.
  • Study supports clinical viability of all tested stapler sizes for canine typhlectomy, but highlights need for in vivo data on healing and complications.

Matz

Veterinary Surgery

4

2022

Ex vivo comparison of different thoracoabdominal stapler sizes for typhlectomy in canine cadavers

2022-4-VS-matz-4

Article Title: Ex vivo comparison of different thoracoabdominal stapler sizes for typhlectomy in canine cadavers

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Fink 2025 et al., on Roux-en-Y outcomes, what was the reported overall postoperative mortality rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Out of 11 animals, 4 died postoperatively, giving a mortality rate of 36%.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 36%.
Out of 11 animals, 4 died postoperatively, giving a mortality rate of 36%.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Roux-en-Y procedures were successfully completed in all 11 cases (6 dogs, 5 cats), despite case complexity and disease severity.
  • Median survival post-discharge was longer in cats (365 days) vs. dogs (82 days), with better outcomes in non-neoplastic vs. neoplastic disease (192 vs. 5 days).
  • Complication rate was high, with septic peritonitis, dehiscence, and cardiac arrest as leading causes of postoperative death; mortality rate = 36%.
  • Dehiscence rate was 8.6% (2 of 23 anastomoses), considered lower than typical rates for GI anastomoses in high-risk patients.
  • Feeding tubes (gastrostomy/jejunostomy) were used in all cases, enabling early nutritional support and stomach decompression.
  • Postoperative nausea and vomiting were common but mostly self-limiting; managed with metoclopramide, cisapride, and antiemetics.
  • Choledochojejunostomy was preferred when common bile duct was dilated, offering a favorable size match and potentially reducing bile leakage.
  • Roux-en-Y reduced typical Billroth II complications (e.g., bile reflux, afferent loop syndrome, dumping syndrome), with none observed in discharged patients.

Fink

Veterinary Surgery

5

2025

Roux‐en‐Y procedure to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract in six dogs and five cats: A descriptive case series

2025-5-VS-fink-1

Article Title: Roux‐en‐Y procedure to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract in six dogs and five cats: A descriptive case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.