← Articles

Berthomé et al: Recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion in 55 dogs after surgical decompression with or without prophylactic fenestration
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

  • Prophylactic fenestration (PF) significantly reduced recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion (0% vs. 37.8%, p < .001).
  • Surgery time was longer with PF (median 182 vs. 110 min, p = .017), but no difference in perioperative complication rates (PF 16.7%, non-PF 18.9%; p = .838).
  • 25% overall recurrence rate, but all recurrences occurred in the non-PF group.
  • Medical management was effective in 92.9% of recurrence cases.
  • Most PF sites targeted adjacent discs; 88.9% were at adjacent levels, which are common recurrence sites.
  • Neurologic outcomes were similar between PF and non-PF dogs post-surgery and at follow-up.
  • Fenestration technique (blade vs. burr) not shown to affect outcome but contributed to extended surgical time.
  • No major complications or deaths linked directly to PF in initial surgeries.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
‍We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍Mind trying that again?
← Articles

Berthomé et al: Recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion in 55 dogs after surgical decompression with or without prophylactic fenestration
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

  • Prophylactic fenestration (PF) significantly reduced recurrence of cervical intervertebral disc extrusion (0% vs. 37.8%, p < .001).
  • Surgery time was longer with PF (median 182 vs. 110 min, p = .017), but no difference in perioperative complication rates (PF 16.7%, non-PF 18.9%; p = .838).
  • 25% overall recurrence rate, but all recurrences occurred in the non-PF group.
  • Medical management was effective in 92.9% of recurrence cases.
  • Most PF sites targeted adjacent discs; 88.9% were at adjacent levels, which are common recurrence sites.
  • Neurologic outcomes were similar between PF and non-PF dogs post-surgery and at follow-up.
  • Fenestration technique (blade vs. burr) not shown to affect outcome but contributed to extended surgical time.
  • No major complications or deaths linked directly to PF in initial surgeries.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Join Now to Access Key Summaries to more Veterinary Surgery Articles!
Log InSign Up

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Berthomé 2025 et al., on prophylactic fenestration in cervical IVDE, what was the overall recurrence rate reported for dogs treated with ventral slot decompression?

A. 10%
B. 18%
C. 25%
D. 33%
E. 42%

Answer: 25%

Explanation: The study reported a 25% recurrence rate overall, with all recurrences in the non-fenestrated group.
In Berthomé 2025 et al., on prophylactic fenestration in cervical IVDE, what was a statistically significant outcome regarding surgery duration?

A. No difference between groups
B. PF group had shorter duration
C. PF group had longer duration
D. Non-PF group had longer duration
E. Surgery duration was unpredictable

Answer: PF group had longer duration

Explanation: Median surgical time was significantly longer in the PF group (182 vs. 110 min, *p* = .017).
In Berthomé 2025 et al., on prophylactic fenestration in cervical IVDE, what was the recurrence rate in the prophylactic fenestration (PF) group?

A. 25%
B. 10%
C. 5%
D. 0%
E. 15%

Answer: 0%

Explanation: None of the dogs in the PF group had a recurrence, suggesting a protective effect.
In Berthomé 2025 et al., on prophylactic fenestration in cervical IVDE, which statement best describes complication rates between PF and non-PF groups?

A. PF group had significantly higher complications
B. Non-PF group had significantly higher complications
C. Both groups had similar complication rates
D. PF group had no complications
E. Only non-PF dogs required revision

Answer: Both groups had similar complication rates

Explanation: There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates (p = .838).
In Berthomé 2025 et al., on prophylactic fenestration in cervical IVDE, what percentage of prophylactic fenestrations were performed at adjacent disc sites?

A. 50%
B. 65%
C. 77%
D. 89%
E. 100%

Answer: 89%

Explanation: 88.9% of prophylactic fenestrations were at adjacent discs, targeting common recurrence sites.

Elevate Your Infection Control Protocol

Implement Simini Protect Lavage for superior, clinically-proven post-operative skin antisepsis and reduced infection risk.

Start Your Free Trial TodayStart Your Free Trial

Review More Key Summaries from this Veterinary Surgery Journal Issue

Dalton

 et al: 

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

Downey

 et al: 

Evaluation of long‐term outcome after lung lobectomy for canine non‐neoplastic pulmonary consolidation via thoracoscopic or thoracoscopic‐assisted surgery in 12 dogs

Clarke

 et al: 

Severity of nasopharyngeal collapse before and after corrective upper airway surgery in brachycephalic dogs

Buote

 et al: 

3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

Lomas

 et al: 

Medium‐term outcomes of hybrid total hip arthroplasty in cats: Cemented femoral stem and cementless acetabular cup in 17 hips (2020–2023)