In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, which feature helped protect the pancreatic duct during lasering?
A. Direct visual guidance
B. External abdominal compression
C. Lateral duodenal traction
D. Catheter positioned over pancreatic duct
E. Cooling irrigation during ablation
Answer: Catheter positioned over pancreatic duct
Explanation: The catheter served as a protective shield over the ductal orifice during the laser procedure.
In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, what was concluded regarding ICBD length and body weight?
A. Significant positive correlation observed
B. Length increased linearly with body weight
C. Larger dogs had longer ICBDs
D. No correlation was found
E. ICBD was shorter in heavier dogs
Answer: No correlation was found
Explanation: Statistical analysis showed no significant correlation (r = 0.06, p = .79).
In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, what was the outcome of the two cases with lateral perforation?
A. Intra-abdominal leakage occurred during irrigation
B. Perforations required open repair
C. No saline egress or visible damage was detected
D. Perforations led to full-thickness bile duct tears
E. Perforations resulted in death of cadavers
Answer: No saline egress or visible damage was detected
Explanation: The two perforations were not visible on post-dissection leak testing and did not cause saline escape.
In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, what was the mean length of the intramural common bile duct (ICBD) identified in dogs?
A. 5.8 ± 2.0 mm
B. 10.2 ± 3.5 mm
C. 15.8 ± 3.0 mm
D. 18.6 ± 4.2 mm
E. 20.1 ± 2.9 mm
Answer: 15.8 ± 3.0 mm
Explanation: ICBD length ranged from 10 to 21 mm, with a mean of 15.8 mm.
In Miyagi 2025 et al., on endoscopic laser sphincterotomy, what defined the transition between the intramural and extramural common bile duct (CBD)?
A. Entry into the peritoneal cavity
B. Bile backflow during lasering
C. Visualization of the pancreatic duct
D. Separation of the duodenal submucosa from CBD wall
E. Sudden increase in duct diameter
Answer: Separation of the duodenal submucosa from CBD wall
Explanation: This anatomic separation reliably marked the end of the ICBD and was used to prevent over-ablation.