In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, what level of inter-rater agreement (kappa) was reported for liver division localization?
A. Fair
B. Moderate
C. Good
D. Excellent
E. Poor
Answer: Excellent
Explanation: Kappa values were as high as 0.885, indicating excellent agreement among radiologists for division-level localization.
In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, CT accuracy was NOT significantly influenced by which of the following?
A. Lobe location
B. Division
C. Contrast phase
D. Histopathologic diagnosis
E. Radiologist experience
Answer: Histopathologic diagnosis
Explanation: No statistical link was found between tumor type and localization accuracy.
In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, which phase of contrast-enhanced CT was most helpful in localization?
A. Portal phase only
B. Hepatic venous phase only
C. Arterial phase
D. Delayed equilibrium phase
E. Both portal and hepatic venous
Answer: Both portal and hepatic venous
Explanation: Both were reported as useful in roughly 30–38% of cases.
In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, which liver lobes showed significantly lower CT localization accuracy?
A. Left medial and quadrate
B. Quadrate and right lateral
C. Right medial and caudate
D. Left lateral and right medial
E. Quadrate and caudate
Answer: Quadrate and right lateral
Explanation: These lobes were significantly more prone to localization errors.
In Thomsen 2024 et al., on CT accuracy for liver tumors, which anatomical level had the highest accuracy?
A. Liver lobe
B. Histologic subtype
C. Portal vein branch
D. Liver division
E. Hepatic artery territory
Answer: Liver division
Explanation: Accuracy was 88% when localizing by division, compared to 74.3% at the lobe level.