In Nicolas 2024 et al., how was the scapular osteotomy stabilized?
A. Single locking plate
B. Single non-locking plate
C. External fixator
D. K-wire cerclage
E. Double 2.4-mm locking plates
Answer: Double 2.4-mm locking plates
Explanation: Two locking plates were placed cranial and caudal to the scapular spine:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
In Nicolas 2024 et al., what postoperative outcome was observed at 1 month?
A. Recurrence of disc extrusion
B. Implant loosening
C. Neurologic deterioration
D. Persistent neck pain
E. Slight thoracic limb lameness
Answer: Slight thoracic limb lameness
Explanation: The dog showed only a slight forelimb lameness, with no pain or neurologic deficit:contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
In Nicolas 2024 et al., what surgical technique was used to decompress the foramen at T1–2?
A. Dorsal laminectomy
B. Hemilaminectomy
C. Lateral corpectomy
D. Mini-hemilaminectomy
E. Pediculectomy
Answer: Mini-hemilaminectomy
Explanation: The foramen was decompressed using a minimally invasive mini-hemilaminectomy while preserving articular facets:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
In Nicolas 2024 et al., what spinal level was targeted using the lateral scapular osteotomy approach?
A. C5–C6
B. T2–T3
C. T1–T2
D. T3–T4
E. T1–T3
Answer: T1–T2
Explanation: The novel lateral approach was used for a foraminal disc extrusion at T1–T2:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
In Nicolas 2024 et al., what was a key advantage of the lateral scapular osteotomy approach versus dorsal or ventral routes?
A. Reduced surgery time
B. Direct visualization of dorsal spinous processes
C. Minimized bleeding
D. Avoided thoracic entry and preserved vertebral stability
E. Enabled bilateral access
Answer: Avoided thoracic entry and preserved vertebral stability
Explanation: The approach offered good foramen access while preserving articular facets and minimizing spinal disruption:contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}