In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, which technique resulted in the **greatest mechanical axis shift**?
A. CBLO + CCWO
B. TPLO + CCWO
C. modified CCWO (mCCWO)
D. proximal tibial neutral wedge osteotomy (PTNWO)
E. standard TPLO
Answer: CBLO + CCWO
Explanation: Group A (CBLO + CCWO) caused the largest change in mechanical cranial distal tibial angle (mCrDTA), indicating the most mechanical axis shift.
In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, which technique achieved the **lowest mean postoperative TPA**?
A. modified CCWO (mCCWO)
B. CBLO + CCWO
C. TPLO + CCWO
D. proximal tibial neutral wedge osteotomy (PTNWO)
E. standard TPLO
Answer: modified CCWO (mCCWO)
Explanation: Group C (mCCWO) had the lowest mean post-correction TPA at 4.76°, although it under-corrected relative to its target of 0°.
In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, which two techniques showed the **highest accuracy** in TPA correction relative to their target?
A. CBLO + CCWO and PTNWO
B. TPLO + CCWO and mCCWO
C. CBLO + CCWO and mCCWO
D. PTNWO and TPLO + CCWO
E. TPLO + CCWO and standard TPLO
Answer: CBLO + CCWO and PTNWO
Explanation: Groups A and D had mean TPA accuracy scores closest to 1.00: 1.02 and 0.98 respectively, indicating high precision.
In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, which group demonstrated **tibial shortening** as an outcome?
A. CBLO + CCWO
B. TPLO + CCWO
C. modified CCWO (mCCWO)
D. proximal tibial neutral wedge osteotomy (PTNWO)
E. none of the above
Answer: TPLO + CCWO
Explanation: Group B (TPLO + CCWO) was the only group associated with tibial shortening (−0.58% change in length).
In Story 2024 et al., on eTPA osteotomy comparison, what was the **minimum acceptable TPA** post-correction reported to yield good outcomes in dogs?
A. >18°
B. ≤14°
C. ≤10°
D. <20°
E. ≤6°
Answer: ≤14°
Explanation: A TPA ≤14° is cited as associated with superior outcomes in dogs with eTPA postoperatively.