In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, how did the number of instrument collisions compare before and after 3DPC use?
A. No change was observed
B. Instrument collisions increased with 3DPCs
C. Instrument collisions decreased significantly with 3DPCs
D. Collisions increased slightly, but not significantly
E. Collisions were eliminated entirely
Answer: Instrument collisions decreased significantly with 3DPCs
Explanation: Collisions dropped from a mean of 6.8 to 2.6 with 3DPC use, *p = 0.03*.
In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what was the primary benefit observed in cadaver surgeries when using 3D printed cannulas (3DPCs)?
A. Improved oxygenation during insufflation
B. Reduced pain scores postoperatively
C. Reduced surgical time and cannula complications
D. Lower anesthesia dose required
E. Decreased incision length
Answer: Reduced surgical time and cannula complications
Explanation: Use of 3DPCs significantly reduced surgical time, instrument collisions, and cannula complications in feline cadaver models.
In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what issue occurred during live case 1 involving insufflation?
A. Valve dislodgement
B. Breakage of the insufflation port
C. Severe CO₂ leakage
D. Sterility failure of the port
E. Pneumothorax
Answer: Breakage of the insufflation port
Explanation: The insufflation connection broke in case 1 but was resolved in case 2 by using a male luer lock connector.
In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what was the approximate manufacturing cost per sterilizable 3D printed cannula?
A. $1.00
B. $2.50
C. $5.00
D. $10.00
E. $20.00
Answer: $5.00
Explanation: Each sterilizable 3D printed cannula cost less than $5 to produce including materials and consumables.
In Buote 2023 et al., on 3D printed cannulas, what procedural outcome showed the largest percent reduction with 3DPCs?
A. Surgery time
B. CO₂ leakage
C. Instrument collisions
D. Incisional complications
E. Cannula pullout events
Answer: Cannula pullout events
Explanation: Pullout events dropped from a mean of 10 to 2.2—a ~78% reduction, more than other measured variables.