In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, which surgical complication was specifically avoided by using the intraoral approach?
A. Contamination of surgical field
B. Inadvertent duct ligation
C. Palpebral nerve damage
D. Salivary fistula formation
E. Facial nerve paralysis
Answer: Palpebral nerve damage
Explanation: IOA avoids the palpebral branch of the auriculopalpebral nerve, reducing risk of lagophthalmos.
In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, which dog conformation was associated with higher difficulty in complete gland removal using IOA?
A. Dolichocephalic
B. Brachycephalic
C. Mesocephalic
D. Toy breed
E. Giant breed
Answer: Brachycephalic
Explanation: In brachycephalic cadavers, remnant gland tissue remained after IOA, likely due to anatomy.
In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, what was a cited benefit of intraoral approach in terms of postoperative management?
A. Shorter hospitalization
B. No need for analgesia
C. Faster mucosal healing
D. No need for Elizabethan collar
E. Minimal blood loss
Answer: No need for Elizabethan collar
Explanation: IOA caused minimal external trauma, eliminating the need for E-collar in all clinical cases.
In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, which structure posed a risk of injury during intraoral dissection of the zygomatic salivary gland?
A. Transverse facial artery
B. Masseteric nerve
C. Deep facial vein
D. Zygomaticofacial nerve
E. Infraorbital sinus
Answer: Deep facial vein
Explanation: Blunt dissection during IOA needed care to avoid damaging the deep facial vein.
In Viitanen 2023 et al., on zygomatic sialoadenectomy, which approach required zygomatic arch osteotomy?
A. Intraoral approach
B. Transpalpebral approach
C. Modified lateral orbitotomy approach
D. Inferior transconjunctival approach
E. Ventral extraoral approach
Answer: Modified lateral orbitotomy approach
Explanation: The modified LOA included a zygomatic arch osteotomy with preservation of the masseter insertion.